@article {86, title = {First record of the family Proctotrupidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea) from Iran, with five new species records}, journal = {Turkish Journal of Zoology}, volume = {40}, year = {2016}, pages = {27-34}, abstract = {

This survey was conducted to investigate the occurrence of the family Proctotrupidae in Iran. The specimens were collected using Malaise traps from northern Iran during 2010 and 2011. The family Proctotrupidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea) is recorded from Iran for the first time. Five species belonging to four genera were identified: Proctotrupes gravidator (Linnaeus, 1758); P. brachypterus (Schrank, 1780); Cryptoserphus aculeator (Haliday, 1839); Disogmus obsoletus Brues, 1905; and Mischoserphus arcuator (Stelfox, 1950). All genera and species are new records for the fauna of Iran. An identification key for the genera of Proctotrupidae is provided.

}, author = {M. Izadizadeh and A.A. Talebi and V.A. Kolyada and E. Rakhshani} } @article {22, title = {First records of the family Proctotrupidae (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea) from Korea}, journal = {Korean J. Syst. Zool.}, volume = {24}, year = {2008}, pages = {173-177}, abstract = {

The family Proctotrupidae Latreille, 1802 is recorded for the first time in Korea. As a result of taxonomic study of the Korean Proctotrupidae, two species Disogmus areolator and Phaneroserphus calcar are reported. A key to the species, redescription, and photographs for diagnostic characters are provided.

}, author = {Jong-Wook Lee and Jin-Man Kwon and Tae-Ho Kim} } @article {117, title = {A new species of the genus Disogmus F{\"o}rster (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Proctotrupidae) from the Eocene Rovno amber.}, journal = {Zookeys}, year = {2011}, pages = {455-459}, abstract = {

Disogmus rasnitsyni Kolyada \& Perkovsky, sp. n. is described from a fossil inclusion of Late Eocene amber (Ukraine). The new species is most similar to D. basalis (Thomson, 1857), in particular, in the shape of the tyloids and the general shortening of the segments of antennae, but distinctly differs from it and the other species of the genus by having tyloids on flagellar segments 2\–4 compared to 3\–6 and 4\–7 in other species.

}, author = {V.A. Kolyada and E.E. Perkovsky} }